Nokia N97: The Definitive Verdict (maybe)

by Ben Smith on 22nd June 2009

On the week of launch with UK network operators the team give you their verdict on Nokia’s new flagship N-series device the N97.  Should you buy it?

Ben, Vikki and James give you the answer straight and Ben and James have a small disagreeement.

{ 99 comments }

Bowenarrow June 24, 2009 at 11:40

Hey James,
Many thanks for the link and this is a very interesting topic off the original topic.

The image in question. I use a Wordpress plugin called Insights on my blog, and it this plug-in that is pulling your “claimed” image from Flickr…. You can right click on the image and pull the URL if you like and you will see I am not claiming it to be mine at all. Here is the URL that http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3407/3476977184_... and as you can see it's got a lot of “flickr, farm4, static” mentioned in the URL. I don’t see any mention of “whatelydude”.

I think you need to raise this “creative commons” issue with the author or <a href=” http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/insights/sc... (Vladimir Prelovac) or with Flickr themselves, before you go insinuating that I am claiming an image that might belong to you. I too post understand Creative Commons on my various blogs and understand what it means. With that said, I am not removing the image or putting any attribution to the original source. As far as I am concerned, the original source is Flickr.

spxdcz June 24, 2009 at 11:53

“As far as I am concerned, the original source is Flickr.”

I'm sorry??? You're saying as long as an image is on Flickr, you have the right to use it?

YOU have the burden of proof to show that you have the rights to use an image, not the other way around; it's not about proving that you DON'T have the rights to use something. Also, you can't claim ignorance because of a third party plug-in; if you CHOOSE to use it, you assume responsibility for it. If someone has pointed out that it is acting illegally, you should choose to remove it.

And clearly, those are the same image. To try to argue otherwise seems incredibly petty, especially from someone who creates web content themselves.

bushra June 24, 2009 at 11:56

wait, does that mean you are happy to use a tool that pulls pictures without giving the owner (the person who takes and publishes that picture on Flickr, not Flickr itself imo) the rightful credit?

DanLane June 24, 2009 at 12:03

Not knowing the source of an image doesn't make a violation of Creative Commons acceptable and the onus is on you to discover the source and license of that photo. You can do this by searching for the photo ID in google. In this case you can plainly see that the photo ID (3476977184) matches the ID of the photo James linked to and you can see that it is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license as described here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed...

You have now been notified of the source of the image by both James and myself, I have explained how you can verify the source for yourself and you have been made aware of the terms of the license.

I expect to see correct attribution or the removal of the link as soon as possible.

Bowenarrow June 24, 2009 at 12:06

Look, if it was James Whatley 's link I was using on my site, then I would change it or remove it or give him credit for the image, but it's not his image. It's got a different URL.

I am not claiming ignorance just because it's a third party application, but for the love of gawd, if you think I am going through all my INSIGHT images and giving credit to the original snapper, you can think again. Besides there is no way of knowing from the second the image is selected in INSIGHTS that it belongs to James or not.

Petty… was making a comment about it in the first place and not checking the original link on my site.

vikkichowney June 24, 2009 at 12:06

'Claimed' image? It's not 'claimed' – he bloody took the photo!

He's not saying you're claiming it be yours either, he's saying you need to reference your sources properly.

Yes, this should be flagged to the author of Insights, but a simple 'Sorry, I'll add a link to your original photo' would have done.

Flickr is the medium that stores the imagery, it owns nothing and each indivudual is the source.

What a ridiculous stream of ill-informed comments…

David Carrington June 24, 2009 at 12:08

You've used a (bad) tool to show it the image on your blog. The plugin should have warned you that the image requires attribution, but it did not. James has now made you aware of the licence for the image and it's your obligation to correct your website.

The usage on your site requires attribution, fact. The URL makes absolutely no difference.

James Marwood June 24, 2009 at 12:17

Hey Mike,

I think it's pretty obvious that the image you're using is James's. Sadly you've been let down by the Insights tool, leading to you inadvertently breaking the terms of the CC licence. I've been burned by a similar error in the past, where I reposted an image that had been created by someone, from a 3rd party aggregator which stripped out all the attribution info.

James hasn't asked you to take down the image, just to give him his due attribution. It's clear you've not intended to do anything wrong, so it would be great if you could just add an attributive link.

Denny June 24, 2009 at 12:37

“if you think I am going through all my INSIGHT images and giving credit to the original snapper, you can think again.”

In that case you can probably look forward to being sued when you get caught using a fully rights-reserved image taken by a professional photographer.

Bowenarrow June 24, 2009 at 12:46

Yes James, let down by some terrible software, which is actually a cool plug-in, but if it causes so much grief it's better off not being used on my site.

I am going to replace the photo and remove the Insight software.

James Whatley, I apologize for using your photo without permission and I will remove all the other photos as well, as I am sure they belong to you in some way or form.

Chris June 24, 2009 at 13:00

Hmmm!

I've ditched Nokia for a year or two now after being a Series 80 Power User and am now the happy onwer of an HTC Touch Pro2. (Yes I've gone to the dark side – WInMo) And do you know what? It isn't that bad at all!!!

Any chance of a considered opinion on that one, boys?

pfig June 24, 2009 at 13:03

You're clearly a moron who

1. doesn't understand what “licensing” means
2. doesn't understand how the Internet works
3. obviously can't engage in intelligent conversation.

I hope you get sued into oblivion; there are enough ignorant smart-asses on the Internet, you won't be missed.

David Carrington June 24, 2009 at 13:34

Different URL is nonsense. Flickr provides multiple URLs for the same image for different sizes. The exact photo you're linking to can be seen on this Flickr page (clearly labelled with CC attribution and James' profile linked):

http://www.flickr.com/photos/whatleydude/347697...

No one has said you should go through all images on your site. We are saying that now you've been informed about this particular photo and it's your legal requirement to correct your page.

Denny June 24, 2009 at 14:08

If he's using a plugin that sources images from Flickr without telling him what their copyright status is, this thread is the gentlest way he could have found out what an incredibly bad idea that is, by a significant margin.

I'd go for removing the plugin, not fixing this one instance. The next person whose work he fails to attribute might not be so polite, nor so liberally licensed in the first place.

Bowenarrow June 24, 2009 at 14:53

Takes one to know one!

JCRivas June 24, 2009 at 18:57

I enjoyed this ingenious Ben vs James review, and today engadget posted a similar Chris vs Thomas “missives interchange”:

http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/22/nokia-n97-re...

jamesbody June 25, 2009 at 08:58

Ben – you re so wonderfully objective in your own grumpy way. You did not mention the fact that the N97 does not support SIP VoIP natively – mission critical FAIL!

On balance I think that I shall be resisting the temptation to commit to a N97. I shall stick with my wonderfully reliable (and feature rich) E71 – which is now available for a FRACTION of the price of a N97!

dsample June 25, 2009 at 15:57

Brilliant, love the conflict. James definitely won the argument though. I've got an E71, but definitely want an N97 if I can blag my boss to get me one.

The widgets are genius. I'm making a widget that will work on my E71 as well as the 5800/N97 I wish I had, and it's pretty darn simple and is such a powerful part of the standby screen.

JamesVincent June 26, 2009 at 13:53

After thinkin of both opinions. I'm with James on this one!

JamesVincent (was kexv)

@pieter13 June 26, 2009 at 19:01

Ben is right. Waiting 6 months aprox. for the stuff to work. Bloody arrogant Nokia. By By i'm of to Apple.

pieter13 June 26, 2009 at 20:06

agreed, amen. (Loooooooong time Nokia user)

pieter13 June 26, 2009 at 20:18

Ben is right. For almost 600 euro's the product should be finished. I will never spend this amount of money on anything that is not 99% thought out. I've been using Nokia's for 10 years now, but i just ordered the 3 GS. Can't wait.

Farrukh June 27, 2009 at 01:17

Which decent phone we can get with at least 16GB memory and GPS with any OS which allows application installation for free and I think Iphone is not an alternative to it but maybe good for some people and not for some. Give us something which is a phone plus easy to update and have some competition with N97.

venkat20 July 1, 2009 at 11:13

Nokia N97 Model mobile is Nice Mobile I am using the Mobile.It was Unlocked From the Vodafone Australia I found the Unlocking Instructions In the site Unlocking Instructions.

Ben Smith July 2, 2009 at 11:46

You absolutely shouldn’t :-)

Neil Hoskins July 2, 2009 at 12:23

Why should anybody take seriously any of the opinions of a pair of lager drinkers?

Ben Smith July 2, 2009 at 12:46

You absolutely shouldn't :-)

jukka saloranta July 4, 2009 at 06:58

Check out this video review of the Nokia N97.
It’s probably the best video review i’ve seen.
A very detailed review with a touch of humour aswell.

Also notice the Nokia N97 vs. Touch Pro2 lightsabers at the end of part 2.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZJe9Nd_wx0

jukka saloranta July 4, 2009 at 07:58

Check out this video review of the Nokia N97.
It's probably the best video review i've seen.
A very detailed review with a touch of humour aswell.

Also notice the Nokia N97 vs. Touch Pro2 lightsabers at the end of part 2.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZJe9Nd_wx0

Ms. Jen July 12, 2009 at 06:36

Wait! Hold the video presses! WHERE IS BEN’S SUIT & TIE???!!!!!????

It makes me truly happy to see Ben & James sparring on video. When are we going to see Vikki & Dan sparring on video?

((p.s. I like the keyboard and I do *use* the stylus. ;o) ))
( p.p.s. I will actually be buying the N86 )
p.p.s.s. More cute doggies in videos.

;oD

Ben Smith July 12, 2009 at 12:19

Agreed – that’s an excellent review… Recommended.

Ben Smith July 12, 2009 at 12:24

The suit is given a weekend pass and spends time with its family…

Agree Vikki and Dan video is overdue… *starts planning*

Noted re: doggies :-)

msjen July 12, 2009 at 07:36

Wait! Hold the video presses! WHERE IS BEN'S SUIT & TIE???!!!!!????

It makes me truly happy to see Ben & James sparring on video. When are we going to see Vikki & Dan sparring on video?

((p.s. I like the keyboard and I do *use* the stylus. ;o) ))
( p.p.s. I will actually be buying the N86 )
p.p.s.s. More cute doggies in videos.

;oD

Mobile Jorge July 12, 2009 at 15:05

Quite funny this vid, I enjoyed it very much, great job Ben and James, damn that almost sounds like the American ice cream – Ben and Jerry lol nah but really great video, keep up the good work

cheers mate

Ben Smith July 12, 2009 at 13:19

Agreed – that's an excellent review… Recommended.

Ben Smith July 12, 2009 at 13:24

The suit is given a weekend pass and spends time with its family…

Agree Vikki and Dan video is overdue… *starts planning*

Noted re: doggies :-)

Jorge July 12, 2009 at 16:05

Quite funny this vid, I enjoyed it very much, great job Ben and James, damn that almost sounds like the American ice cream – Ben and Jerry lol nah but really great video, keep up the good work

cheers mate

TheProdigalFool July 14, 2009 at 13:13

I’ve spent about an hour with a N97 and I’m with Ben on this one.

Ben Smith July 14, 2009 at 14:38

All the smart kids are :-)

TheProdigalFool July 14, 2009 at 14:13

I've spent about an hour with a N97 and I'm with Ben on this one.

Ben Smith July 14, 2009 at 15:38

All the smart kids are :-)

Anonymous July 25, 2009 at 11:15

part of my job is to check other network stores in town and see what they offer (I work for a T-Mobile store).

Just came across this AMAZING offer on the N97. Free N97 Black, £45 a month, 1200 Minutes, Unlimited Landlines, Unlimited Texts, 500MB Internet all on a 18 month contract!

worldofnokia July 25, 2009 at 12:15

part of my job is to check other network stores in town and see what they offer (I work for a T-Mobile store).

Just came across this AMAZING offer on the N97. Free N97 Black, £45 a month, 1200 Minutes, Unlimited Landlines, Unlimited Texts, 500MB Internet all on a 18 month contract!

jennyward88 July 26, 2009 at 00:19

i was told today by a t-mobile store worker that they don’t have the N97 yet as it failed t-mobiles tests?! they are retesting it and if it passes they’ll have it in 3-4 weeks.
was looking forward to getting this phone on friday, i really dont want to have to wait!

jennyward88 July 26, 2009 at 01:19

i was told today by a t-mobile store worker that they don't habe the N97 yet as it failed t-mobiles tests?! they are retesting it and if it passes they'll have it in 3-4 weeks.
was looking forward to getting this phone on friday, i really dont want to have to wait!

Mac Morrison July 26, 2009 at 08:25

I’m with ben – its a nightmare with your fingers, its slow unresponsive and does unexpected things. esp when trying to scroll menus.

it becomes way more responsive and satisfying with a stylus.

resistive screens need stylus
capacitive screens love fingers

S60 5th edition isnt finger friendly.

Mac Morrison July 26, 2009 at 09:25

I'm with ben – its a nightmare with your fingers, its slow unresponsive and does unexpected things. esp when trying to scroll menus.

it becomes way more responsive and satisfying with a stylus.

resistive screens need stylus
capacitive screens love fingers

S60 5th edition isnt finger friendly.

fusi December 5, 2009 at 20:55

‘get an iphone’ hahahahaha :p

fusi December 5, 2009 at 20:55

'get an iphone' hahahahaha :p

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 11 trackbacks }

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: